【Body】Estimated reading time: 8 minutes.

The Dawn of a New Historical Drama: “Toyotomi Brothers”

Happy New Year to everyone tuning in! This is Tobira AI.

Tomorrow marks the premiere of the 2026 NHK Taiga Drama, Toyotomi Brothers. As someone deeply involved in education, I have a theory about social studies teachers: they often hesitate to talk about the “Sengoku Jidai” (Warring States period) in casual conversation. Why? Because it immediately exposes them as massive “Otaku” (geeks).

Almost everyone who loves history started with the Sengoku period. My own journey began about 35 years ago, playing a massive NES cartridge called Nobunaga’s Ambition: Zenkokuban (National Edition) with my father. Our house was also filled with historical novels. The first historical novel I read intended for adults was not a textbook, but the works of Ryotaro Shiba and Chogoro Kaionji.

When you grow up reading books like that from elementary school, you inevitably graduate from a “history lover” to a full-blown “history otaku.” It has always frustrated me that society has a strange equation: being good at English is “cool,” being good at Math makes you “smart,” but being an expert in Japanese history makes you a “nerd.”

Setting that grievance aside, once I start talking about the Warring States period, I can’t stop. However, since specific battles of this era rarely appear in elementary or junior high school exams, I usually keep my mouth shut in the classroom. But today, in honor of the new drama, I am unsealing my thoughts.

The Great “What If”: Could Hidenaga Have Saved the Toyotomi Clan?

The protagonist of the new drama is Toyotomi Hidenaga, the younger half-brother of the Great Unifier, Toyotomi Hideyoshi.

History tells us that Hideyoshi unified Japan in 1590, but Hidenaga died of illness the very next year, in 1591. Hidenaga was a remarkably capable figure. Though he reportedly started as a simple, rustic young man who doubted he could ever be a samurai, he grew alongside his brother’s power. He became a brave commander and, perhaps more importantly, the vital mediator within the administration.

Hideyoshi trusted him implicitly. When the warlord Otomo Sorin came to the capital, Hideyoshi famously told him, “For internal matters, speak to Sen no Rikyu; for public matters, consult the Great Councilor of Yamato (Hidenaga).”

This leads to a classic historical “If”: Had the capable Hidenaga not died early, could the decline of the Toyotomi family and its eventual destruction in 1615 have been prevented?

I used to avidly read Taichi Sakaiya’s Toyotomi Hidenaga. Although written in 1993, it is being republished for the drama. I remember discussing it with friends in high school; its simple prose was filled with profound insights for my teenage self.

To test this scenario, I decided to ask Google’s AI, Gemini, to simulate history. I asked three different models: “What if Hidenaga lived until 1610 (age 71), when Hideyoshi’s heir was fully grown?”

AI Analysis: The “Flash” Model’s Conclusion

Gemini Flash suggests that if Hidenaga had lived until 1610, the decisive Battle of Sekigahara would likely never have happened.

The AI predicts that the Toyotomi family would have survived as a modern daimyo or a family symbolizing the authority of the Imperial Court. Instead of the “Tokugawa hegemony” we know from the Edo period, Japan might have seen a complex “coalition government” where the Toyotomi and Tokugawa families maintained a balance of power.

When Hidenaga died in 1591, Hideyoshi reportedly lamented, “My house is finished.” Flash suggests Hideyoshi understood that he had lost both the “brakes and the lubricant” of his administration.

AI Analysis: The “Thinking” Model’s Conclusion

Gemini Thinking aligns with the consensus of many history fans: Hidenaga’s survival would have prevented the total destruction of the Toyotomi clan.

However, it notes that given Tokugawa Ieyasu’s immense political acumen, it would have been difficult for the Toyotomi to keep absolute control. Instead, they likely would have survived as a special family with high authority—similar to the Regents (Sekkan-ke)—or as a massive daimyo ruling Western Japan, lasting until the end of the feudal era.

Crucially, if Hidenaga had been alive to leave a will to the young heir Hideyori saying, “Do not fight Tokugawa; preserve the family line,” the tragedy of the Siege of Osaka would have been avoided.

AI Analysis: The “Pro” Model’s Conclusion

Gemini Pro goes even further, predicting the establishment of a “Toyotomi Shogunate.”

It argues that Hidenaga’s survival would not only prevent Sekigahara but allow the Toyotomi to continue ruling without being usurped by the Tokugawa. It offers interesting variations:

• A Coalition Government: Tokugawa Ieyasu is not eliminated but used as a powerful figure in the East, creating a federation-style state.
• Dual Power Centers: A balance between Osaka (Toyotomi) and Edo (Tokugawa). While tension might rise later, the Toyotomi’s economic and military base in Western Japan would remain too solid for the Tokugawa to touch.

My Take on the AI: The Pro model suggests that Hidenaga was more than just a general; he was the “balancer” that maintained the system itself. His presence would have curbed Hideyoshi’s late-life madness (such as the disastrous invasions of Korea and internal purges). Interestingly, the “smarter” the AI model, the higher it rates the probability of Toyotomi’s survival.

The Educator’s Rebuttal: Why Extinction Was Inevitable

Despite the AI’s optimism, I believe the Toyotomi family was doomed, regardless of Hidenaga’s lifespan.

Here is my counter-argument, based on the fundamental nature of Hideyoshi’s regime.

Premise 1: Hideyoshi was not a “Charismatic Leader” but a “Clown”

Toyotomi Hideyoshi was undeniably a genius who rose from a peasant to the ruler of Japan. However, his core skill in winning people over was his ability to play the clown (Pierrot) without limit.

He could laugh off being worked to the bone by his predecessor, Oda Nobunaga. During the “Great Chugoku Retreat,” he threw away all the gold in Himeji Castle to boost troop morale, not caring if he became penniless. He never found it painful to humble himself. While effective, this created a dangerous precedent: everyone, including his rivals, saw this humility as his “normal” state.

Let’s look at the situation after the Honnoji Incident (1582). After defeating his immediate enemies, Hideyoshi faced a massive challenge in 1584: The Battle of Komaki and Nagakute. This was a clash against Oda Nobukatsu (Nobunaga’s son) and Tokugawa Ieyasu.

At this time, Hidenaga was successfully attacking Nobukatsu’s territories. However, Hideyoshi could not defeat Ieyasu in battle. Instead, Hideyoshi won strategically by bribing and turning Nobukatsu to his side.

Crucially, Hideyoshi never militarily conquered Ieyasu. To get Ieyasu to pledge allegiance, Hideyoshi had to:

1. Force his own sister to divorce her husband and marry Ieyasu.
2. Send his own mother to Ieyasu’s territory as a hostage.

Only then did Ieyasu bow. But this wasn’t a conquest; it was a negotiation where the “winner” humbled himself. Ieyasu kept his massive territories (Suruga, Totomi, Mikawa, Kai, Shinano) intact. These lands represented the combined power of previous legendary warlords like Takeda Shingen and Imagawa Yoshimoto.

In 1590, Hideyoshi moved Ieyasu to the Kanto region. He surrounded Ieyasu with loyal vassals (Horio, Yamauchi, Nakamura), essentially as spies. But here is the fatal flaw: Ieyasu controlled 2.5 million koku (rice yield measure of wealth), while the Toyotomi direct lands were only 2 million koku.

The vassal was richer than the master. This distorted structure is why the “spies” eventually defected to Ieyasu during the Battle of Sekigahara.

Premise 2: The Toyotomi Regime Had No Structure

By 1591, Hidenaga held 1.1 million koku. Combined with Hideyoshi, the clan technically held 3.1 million. But the Toyotomi “government” was a mirage. It was a dictatorship run by Hideyoshi and a few bureaucrats. The famous “Council of Five Elders” was a desperate invention made right before his death.

Hideyoshi launched foreign invasions (Korea) without solidifying his political foundation at home. When he died, the vacuum led to immediate infighting between the “Militant Faction” (Kato Kiyomasa) and the “Civilian Faction” (Ishida Mitsunari)—a split Ieyasu easily exploited.

Premise 3: A Lack of Hereditary Loyalty

The prevailing theory is that, other than Hidenaga, the Toyotomi family lacked capable kin. I also believe Hideyoshi’s purge of his nephew Hidetsugu expedited the clan’s fall.

The Toyotomi administration was essentially a coalition of “Tozama” (outsider) daimyo. There were no “Fudai” (hereditary) vassals who had served the clan for generations. Without Hidenaga, there was no glue holding this coalition together.

The Fatal Mistake: Hideyoshi Should Have Crushed Ieyasu

Hideyoshi was a diplomatic genius, but perhaps not suited for ultimate authority. He bought loyalty with gold (distributing distinct coins to lords). But true authority and respect come from the leader’s internal character, not their wallet. Hideyoshi spent his final moments begging his vassals, “Please, take care of my son.” It was pathetic.

He should have ruthlessly reduced the territories of the great lords (Tokugawa, Mori, Uesugi, etc.) or destroyed them entirely.

Comparison with Previous Shogunates:

• Kamakura Shogunate: The Hojo clan stabilized power by exterminating powerful rival clans.
• Muromachi Shogunate: Failed because they gave too much land to constables, losing control.

Hideyoshi committed the error of the Muromachi era. He should have used his total power to crush Ieyasu, even if it took 5 years. If he had reduced Ieyasu to a minor lord, the Toyotomi regime might have survived even under the less capable heir, Hideyori.

The Tokugawa Shogunate lasted 260 years because Ieyasu ruthlessly confiscated 5 million koku of land from his enemies after Sekigahara, ensuring the Tokugawa family (7 million koku) was untouchable compared to the next richest lord (Maeda at 1 million).

History has no example of a vassal stronger than his master not usurping the throne. Whether in ancient China (Cao Pi, Sima Yan) or Japan, power dictates the outcome. Hideyoshi knew this, yet he relied on charm rather than force to handle Ieyasu. That was the seal of their doom.

Educational Takeaways: What We Can Learn

History is not just about memorizing dates; it is about learning how to live. If you’ve read this far, here are the lessons I want to pass on to my students (and you):

1. Never procrastinate on “Root Problems.” Hideyoshi used diplomatic band-aids to handle the Ieyasu problem instead of solving it fundamentally with force.

• Lesson: In studies or relationships, don’t just “smooth things over” with a smile or a quick fix. If you ignore a fundamental weakness, it will eventually grow large enough to destroy you.

2. “Competence (Numbers)” beats “Titles” and “Charm.” Hideyoshi had the title (Regent) and the charm (Social Skills). Ieyasu had the numbers (2.5 million koku). The numbers won.

• Lesson: Being a “nice person” or having a fancy job title isn’t enough. You must build undeniable skill and substance (hard skills) that no one can question.

3. Money cannot buy “Respect.” Hideyoshi threw gold at people to make them like him. It didn’t work when it mattered.

• Lesson: Trying to keep friends by buying them things is not leadership; it’s insecurity. True trust comes from your character and how you face adversity.

4. Have the Critical Thinking to “Doubt.” The AI predicted peace based on surface data. I used deep structural analysis (economics and human nature) to predict war.

• Lesson: Don’t blindly trust textbooks, AI, or “common theories.” Always ask “Why?” and check the preconditions. That is how you develop true insight.

---

【日本語要約】 2026年大河ドラマ『豊臣兄弟！』の放送を記念し、主人公・豊臣秀長がもし長生きしていたら豊臣家は滅亡しなかったのか、という歴史の「if」をAI（Gemini）と議論した。AIは「秀長がいれば関ヶ原の戦いは起きず、豊臣幕府または連立政権が成立した」と楽観的な予測を示した。 しかし、私（歴史教師）の結論は異なる。たとえ秀長が生きていても、豊臣家の滅亡は不可避だったと考える。その理由は、秀吉が最大のライバル・徳川家康を武力で屈服させず、人質や外交といった小手先の「人たらし」術で誤魔化したからだ。結果、家康は250万石という豊臣直轄領（200万石）を上回る実力を温存し、これが関ヶ原での裏切りの構造的要因となった。 ここから得られる教訓は、「根本的な問題（家康）を先送りにするな」「愛嬌や肩書きよりも、圧倒的な実力（数字）が物を言う」「金で尊敬は買えない」という点だ。AIの予測を疑い、歴史の構造的欠陥を見抜くクリティカル・シンキングの重要性を説いた。

【简体中文摘要】 为纪念2026年大河剧《丰臣兄弟！》开播，本文通过AI（Gemini）探讨了一个历史假设：如果丰臣秀长长寿，丰臣家族是否能避免灭亡？AI给出了乐观的预测，认为“如果秀长在世，关原之战就不会发生，丰臣幕府或联合政权将成立”。 然而，作为历史老师的笔者持不同意见。笔者认为，即使秀长活着，丰臣家的灭亡也是不可避免的。根本原因在于丰臣秀吉未能通过武力彻底征服最大的竞争对手德川家康，而是依赖人质和外交手段等“笼络人心”的小聪明来掩盖问题。结果，家康保留了250万石的领地，超过了丰臣直辖的200万石，这种实力倒挂是关原之战背叛的结构性原因。 本文总结了四个教训：不要推迟解决根本性问题（如家康）；实力（数字）胜过魅力和头衔；金钱买不来真正的尊敬；以及拥有质疑AI和教科书的批判性思维的重要性。

【한국어 요약】 2026년 대하드라마 ‘도요토미 형제!’ 방영을 기념하여, 주인공 도요토미 히데나가가 장수했다면 도요토미 가문은 멸망하지 않았을까 하는 역사적 ‘만약(if)’을 AI(Gemini)와 토론했다. AI는 “히데나가가 있었다면 세키가하라 전투는 일어나지 않았을 것이며, 도요토미 막부 혹은 연립 정권이 성립되었을 것”이라는 낙관적인 예측을 내놓았다. 그러나 역사 교사인 필자의 결론은 다르다. 설령 히데나가가 살아있었다 해도 도요토미 가문의 멸망은 피할 수 없었을 것이다. 그 이유는 히데요시가 최대 라이벌인 도쿠가와 이에야스를 무력으로 굴복시키지 않고, 인질이나 외교 같은 임기응변식 처세술로 얼버무렸기 때문이다. 결과적으로 이에야스는 250만 석이라는 거대 세력을 보존하여 도요토미 직할령(200만 석)을 능가하게 되었고, 이것이 멸망의 구조적 원인이 되었다. 여기서 얻을 수 있는 교훈은 “근본적인 문제(이에야스)를 뒤로 미루지 말라”, “애교나 직함보다는 압도적인 실력(숫자)이 중요하다”, “돈으로 존경을 살 수는 없다”는 점이다. AI의 예측을 의심하고 역사의 구조적 결함을 꿰뚫어 보는 비판적 사고의 중요성을 강조했다.

【Résumé en français】 À l’occasion de la série historique “Les Frères Toyotomi” (2026), j’ai débattu avec une IA (Gemini) sur une uchronie : le clan Toyotomi aurait-il survécu si Hidenaga, le frère capable de Hideyoshi, avait vécu plus longtemps ? L’IA prédit avec optimisme que la bataille de Sekigahara aurait été évitée et qu’un “Shogunat Toyotomi” aurait vu le jour. Cependant, en tant que professeur d’histoire, je réfute cette thèse. L’extinction des Toyotomi était inévitable. La raison fondamentale est que Hideyoshi n’a jamais vaincu militairement son rival, Tokugawa Ieyasu. Il a préféré le charmer par la diplomatie et l’argent. Résultat : Ieyasu a conservé une puissance de 2,5 millions de koku, surpassant les 2 millions du clan Toyotomi. Ce déséquilibre structurel a scellé leur sort. Les leçons à tirer sont universelles : ne jamais procrastiner face aux problèmes fondamentaux, la “compétence réelle” (les chiffres) l’emporte toujours sur le charisme, et l’argent n’achète pas le respect. Il est crucial de cultiver un esprit critique face aux prédictions de l’IA.

【Deutsche Zusammenfassung】 Anlässlich des Starts des historischen Dramas “Die Toyotomi-Brüder” (2026) habe ich mit einer KI (Gemini) diskutiert: Hätte der Toyotomi-Clan überlebt, wenn der fähige Bruder Hidenaga länger gelebt hätte? Die KI prognostiziert optimistisch, dass die Schlacht von Sekigahara vermieden worden wäre und ein “Toyotomi-Shogunat” entstanden wäre. Als Geschichtslehrer widerspreche ich jedoch. Der Untergang war unvermeidlich, unabhängig von Hidenagas Lebensdauer. Der Grund liegt darin, dass Hideyoshi seinen größten Rivalen, Tokugawa Ieyasu, nie militärisch besiegte, sondern versuchte, ihn durch Diplomatie und Charme zu beschwichtigen. Dadurch behielt Ieyasu eine Machtbasis von 2,5 Millionen Koku, was die 2 Millionen der Toyotomi übertraf. Dieses strukturelle Ungleichgewicht führte zum Verrat. Die Lehren daraus sind: Schieben Sie fundamentale Probleme nicht auf; echte Kompetenz (Zahlen) schlägt Titel und Charme; und Respekt kann man nicht kaufen. Dieser Artikel betont die Wichtigkeit des kritischen Denkens gegenüber KI-Prognosen.

【Versión en español】 Con motivo del drama histórico “Hermanos Toyotomi” (2026), debatí con una IA (Gemini) una hipótesis: ¿Habría sobrevivido el clan Toyotomi si Hidenaga hubiera vivido más tiempo? La IA predice optimistamente que la Batalla de Sekigahara no habría ocurrido y que habría surgido un “Shogunato Toyotomi”. Sin embargo, como profesor de historia, difiero. La extinción de los Toyotomi era inevitable. La razón fundamental es que Hideyoshi nunca derrotó militarmente a su rival, Tokugawa Ieyasu, sino que optó por “encantarlo” con diplomacia y dinero. Como resultado, Ieyasu conservó un poder de 2,5 millones de koku, superando los 2 millones de Toyotomi. Este desequilibrio estructural selló su destino. Las lecciones son claras: no pospongas los problemas fundamentales (como Ieyasu); la competencia real (los números) vence al carisma; y el dinero no compra el respeto. Es vital mantener un pensamiento crítico frente a las predicciones de la IA.

【Suomenkielinen yhteenveto】 Vuoden 2026 historiallisen draaman “Toyotomi-veljekset” kunniaksi keskustelin tekoälyn (Gemini) kanssa vaihtoehtohistoriasta: olisiko Toyotomi-klaani selvinnyt, jos kyvykäs veli Hidenaga olisi elänyt pidempään? Tekoäly ennustaa optimistisesti, että ratkaiseva Sekigaharan taistelu olisi vältetty ja Toyotomi-hallinto olisi jatkunut. Historianopettajana olen kuitenkin eri mieltä. Toyotomin tuho oli väistämätön. Syy on se, että hallitsija Hideyoshi ei koskaan kukistanut kilpailijaansa Tokugawa Ieyasua sotilaallisesti, vaan yritti hurmata tämän diplomatialla. Tämän seurauksena Ieyasu säilytti valtavan 2,5 miljoonan kokun omaisuuden, mikä ylitti Toyotomin omat varat. Tämä rakenteellinen epätasapaino johti lopulta vallankaappaukseen. Opetukset ovat: älä viivyttele juuriongelmien ratkaisemista, todellinen kompetenssi voittaa pelkän karisman, eikä rahalla voi ostaa kunnioitusta. Kriittinen ajattelu on välttämätöntä tekoälyn ennusteita arvioitaessa.

【हिंदी सारांश】 2026 के ऐतिहासिक ड्रामा ‘तो요ोटोमी ब्रदर्स’ के उपलक्ष्य में, मैंने AI (जेमिनी) के साथ चर्चा की: क्या तो요ोटोमी कबीला बच जाता अगर सक्षम भाई हिदेनागा लंबे समय तक जीवित रहता? AI का अनुमान है कि सेकिगाहारा की लड़ाई नहीं होती और तो요ोटोमी का शासन जारी रहता। हालांकि, एक इतिहास शिक्षक के रूप में, मैं इससे असहमत हूं। तो요ोटोमी का पतन अपरिहार्य था। मुख्य कारण यह था कि हिदेयोशी ने अपने सबसे बड़े प्रतिद्वंद्वी, तोकुगावा इयेयासु को युद्ध में कभी नहीं हराया, बल्कि कूटनीति से उसे खुश करने की कोशिश की। नतीजतन, इयेयासु ने 2.5 मिलियन ‘कोकू’ (चावल की उपज) की शक्ति बरकरार रखी, जो तो요ोटोमी की अपनी शक्ति से अधिक थी। यह संरचनात्मक असंतुलन उनके विनाश का कारण बना। इससे हमें ये सबक मिलते हैं: मूलभूत समस्याओं को कभी न टालें; वास्तविक क्षमता (आंकड़े) हमेशा पद और आकर्षण पर भारी पड़ती है; और पैसे से सम्मान नहीं खरीदा जा सकता। AI की भविष्यवाणियों पर आंख मूंदकर भरोसा न करें, बल्कि आलोचनात्मक सोच रखें।