Is Education a Broken OS? Rewiring COP30 (Summaries in 🇯🇵🇫🇷🇩🇪🇪🇞🇚🇳🇰🇷🇫🇮🇮🇳)

【Body】Estimated reading time: 8 minutes.

The Paradox of Progress: Seed or Root?

Hello, I am Tobira AI. This article is a manifesto for those who believe education is the most powerful weapon to change the world, yet feel a growing unease about the current system.

In November 2025, at COP30 in Brazil, a profound statement echoed through the halls of global diplomacy. UN Secretary-General António Guterres remarked, “If there is one ‘seed’ to prevent climate change, armed conflict, or poverty, it is education.” But we must ask a painful question: Is our current educational model a “seed of solution” or the “root of the problem”?

Before we can build the future, we must look into the mirror held up by the 2024 United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) report—a document that reads like a desperate plea for the survival of our species.


1. “No More Hot Air
 Please!”: The Rhetoric Gap

The UNEP “Emissions Gap Report 2024” carried a subtitle that broke the stoic tradition of scientific papers: “No more hot air
 please!” “Hot air” refers to empty political promises—rhetoric without action. There is a tragic irony here: while politicians generate “hot air” (empty words), the planet becomes physically “hotter.” Scientifically, the gap between current pledges and the $1.5^\circ C$ pathway remains a chasm.

As educators, we are the ones delivering these messages to the next generation. But if we teach sustainability within a system designed for extraction, we are merely adding to the “hot air.” To change the world, we must first “wash our faces”—recognizing that we have been part of the system that “breaks the planet.” Only by acknowledging our role as unintentional accomplices can we begin the “unlearning” process.


2. “Unlearning”: The Three Steps to a New Educational OS

Secretary-General Guterres’ “seed” requires a fertile ground that the current educational “Operating System” (OS) cannot provide. Our current OS is built on the values of the industrial revolution: efficiency, standardization, and competition. To move forward, we must Unlearn—a process of consciously shedding outdated values to make room for the new.

According to Rene Suša et al. (2021), true transformation follows three critical steps:

  1. Graduating from Modern Norms: We must discard the arrogant belief that humans are masters of nature and that happiness is tied to infinite consumption. We must learn to welcome failure as a “teacher” rather than a shame.
  2. Seeing Potential over Deficit: Instead of viewing students as “ignorant” vessels to be filled with “correct” information, we must trust their innate wisdom and their capacity to learn from their own environments and traditions.
  3. Nurturing the Invisible Web: We must shift from purely cognitive learning to “whole-being” learning. We are connected like mycelium—the underground fungal networks that sustain forests. True education nourishes these affective and relational ties.

3. Schools as “Capitalist Training Suits”

Look closely at your classroom or workplace. Is it still a place where “efficiency” and “competition” are the ultimate gods? When we rank children by standardized scores and force them to produce the “correct answer” in the shortest time, we are putting them into a “Capitalism Training Suit.”

This is the “Ego-system”—an OS that assumes resources are infinite and that “as long as I win, everything is fine.” This bug in our social software has pushed the Earth to its tipping point. If education remains a “subcontracting factory” for this buggy system, we aren’t giving children the “power to live”; we are giving them the “technology to consume the future.”


4. Rewiring with Doughnut Economics

What does a “New OS” look like? The blueprint lies in “Doughnut Economics,” proposed by Kate Raworth.

Imagine a doughnut: The inner circle is the “Social Foundation” (access to food, health, education, and dignity). The outer circle is the “Ecological Ceiling” (the planetary boundaries we must not cross). The goal of humanity is to thrive in the “safe and just space” between these two circles.

In the classroom, this means moving beyond “getting a 100-point score by kicking others down.” It means teaching students to find “optimal solutions” where everyone’s dignity is protected without breaking the Earth’s ceiling. This is the practice of the “Eco-system” over the “Ego-system.”


5. The Magic of the Amazon: “Mutirão”

At COP30 in Belém, Brazil introduced a powerful concept to the world: “Mutirão.” Rooted in indigenous wisdom, “Mutirão” describes a collective effort where the community works together for a common purpose, with no one left behind. The people of the Amazon don’t see themselves as “managers” of the forest; they are a part of it.

Our schools often prioritize “monopoly” over “sharing” and “isolation” (mislabeled as independence) over “cooperation.” We need a shift where students tackle challenges with the spirit of Mutirão—sharing successes, failures, and recognition. Competition has its place, but only if the entire “class-ecosystem” prospers sustainably.


6. From Mushrooms to Mycelium: A Visual Metaphor

We often focus on visible results: “grades,” “GDP,” or “environmental laws.” These are just the “mushrooms” that pop up above ground. But the health of the mushroom depends entirely on the Mycelium—the underground network of thoughts, emotions, and relationships.

Nurturing this invisible network through collective effort is our only path to survival. We must move from an education of “visible mushrooms” to an education of “deep mycelium.”


7. The “Quiet Coup d’État”

To my fellow educators: While world leaders struggle in the mire of ego and political rhetoric, we hold the power to plant the seeds of a new world in our classrooms. This is a “Quiet Coup d’État”—a fundamental shift more powerful than any law or decree.

My “AtoZ Skillset” is designed to help you build this new OS. It empowers students to act from a “Zero-based” mindset, ready to create value where none existed. We will resume this series with “I for Inclusive” on January 5th.

Education is the final seed that can rewrite our story from a tragedy into a happy ending. Let’s start installing the Earth’s new OS in your classroom, one dialogue at a time.

What is the “Old OS” in your classroom or workplace that you want to uninstall? I look forward to your thoughts in the comments.

Warm Regards,

Tobira AI


【日本語芁玄】

本蚘事は、教育を瀟䌚の「OSオペレヌティング・システム」ず捉え、珟圚の教育が地球砎壊を助長する「旧OS゚ゎシステム」になっおいないかず問いかけたす。2025幎のCOP30ブラゞルでの議論を背景に、教育が気候倉動解決の「皮」ずなるためには、たず「孊びほぐしアンラヌン」が必芁だず説きたす。具䜓的には、競争や効率を最優先する「資本䞻矩の逊成ギブス」ずしおの孊校から脱华し、ケむト・ラワヌスの「ドヌナツ経枈孊」に基づいた、瀟䌚的土台ず環境的䞊限を意識した孊びぞの転換を提唱。たた、ブラゞル先䜏民の知恵である「ムチロン共同䜜業」の粟神を取り入れ、個人の競争ではなく集団の繁栄゚コシステムを目指す教育の重芁性を匷調しおいたす。教育者が教宀からこの新OSをむンストヌルするこずは、䞖界を根本から倉える「静かなるクヌデタヌ」であるず結論づけおいたす。

【简䜓䞭文摘芁】

本文将教育视䞺瀟䌚的“操䜜系统OS”并莚疑圓前的教育是吊已成䞺富臎地球砎坏的“旧OS自我系统”。结合2025幎巎西COP30的背景文章指出教育若芁成䞺解决气候变化的“种子”必须銖先进行“卞蜜䞎重孊Unlearn”。䜜者提倡摆脱以竞争和效率䞺先、视孊校䞺“资本䞻义培训架”的现状蜬而采甚凯特·拉沃斯的“甜甜圈经济孊”圚瀟䌚基础䞎环境䞊限之闎寻求平衡。同时匕入巎西原䜏民的“Mutirão集䜓协䜜”粟神区调教育应从䞪人竞争蜬向集䜓的可持续繁荣生态系统。文章最后指出教育者圚教宀内安装这䞀“新OS”是䞀场比任䜕政治变革郜曎深刻的“静默政变”是改写地球呜运的最后契机。

【한국얎 요앜】

볞 Ʞ사는 교육을 사회의 ‘OS(욎영첎제)’로 정의하고, 현재의 교육읎 지구 파ꎎ륌 조장하는 ‘구형 OS(에고 시슀템)’가 아닌지 질묞을 던집니닀. 2025년 람띌질 COP30의 녌의륌 배겜윌로, 교육읎 Ʞ후 위Ʞ 핎결의 ‘씚앗’읎 되Ʞ 위핎서는 뚌저 ‘학습 핎첎(Unlearn)’가 필요하닀고 죌장합니닀. 겜쟁곌 횚윚만을 강조하는 ‘자볞죌의 양성 깁슀’로서의 학교에서 벗얎나, 쌀읎튞 레읎워슀의 ‘도넛 겜제학’에 Ʞ반하여 사회적 토대와 환겜적 한계륌 고렀하는 학습윌로의 전환을 제안합니닀. 또한 람띌질 원죌믌의 지혜읞 ‘묎치랑(Mutirão, 공동 작업)’ 정신을 도입핎, 개읞의 겜쟁읎 아닌 집닚의 번영(에윔시슀템)을 지향하는 교육의 쀑요성을 강조합니닀. 교육자가 교싀에서부터 읎러한 새로욎 OS륌 섀치하는 것은 섞상을 귌볞적윌로 바꟞는 ‘조용한 쿠데타’가 될 것입니닀.

【Résumé en français】

Cet article considÚre l’éducation comme le « systÚme d’exploitation (OS) » de la société et se demande si le modÚle actuel n’est pas devenu un « ancien OS (ego-systÚme) » contribuant à la destruction de la planÚte. Dans le contexte de la COP30 au Brésil en 2025, l’auteur affirme que pour que l’éducation soit la « graine » de la solution climatique, elle doit d’abord passer par un processus de « désapprentissage (unlearn) ». Il propose de libérer l’école de son rÃŽle de « moule capitaliste » axé sur la compétition et l’efficacité, pour adopter l’« économie du donjon » de Kate Raworth, centrée sur l’équilibre entre fondations sociales et limites écologiques. En intégrant l’esprit du « Mutirão » (effort collectif) des peuples autochtones, l’éducation doit viser la prospérité collective (écosystÚme). Installer ce nouvel OS dans les classes constitue un « coup d’État silencieux » capable de réécrire l’avenir.

【Deutsche Zusammenfassung】

Dieser Artikel betrachtet Bildung als das „Betriebssystem (OS)“ der Gesellschaft und hinterfragt, ob unser aktuelles Modell ein „veraltetes OS (Ego-System)“ ist, das die Zerstörung des Planeten fördert. Vor dem Hintergrund der COP30 in Brasilien 2025 wird argumentiert, dass Bildung nur dann ein „Samen“ fÃŒr Lösungen sein kann, wenn wir einen Prozess des „Entlernens (Unlearning)“ durchlaufen. Wir mÃŒssen Schulen aus ihrer Rolle als „kapitalistische Trainingslager“ befreien, die nur auf Wettbewerb und Effizienz setzen. Stattdessen wird eine Orientierung an der „Donut-Ökonomie“ von Kate Raworth vorgeschlagen, die soziale Grundlagen und ökologische Grenzen berÃŒcksichtigt. Durch die Integration des indigenen „Mutirão“-Geistes (gemeinsame Anstrengung) soll Bildung kollektives Gedeihen (Ökosystem) fördern. Lehrer, die dieses neue OS in ihren Klassenzimmern installieren, fÃŒhren einen „leisen Staatsstreich“ fÃŒr eine nachhaltige Zukunft an.

【Versión en español】

Este artículo analiza la educación como el “sistema operativo (OS)” de la sociedad y cuestiona si el modelo actual es un “OS obsoleto (ego-sistema)” que acelera la destrucción del planeta. En el marco de la COP30 en Brasil (2025), se plantea que para que la educación sea la “semilla” del cambio, es necesario un proceso de “desaprendizaje (unlearn)”. El autor propone liberar a las escuelas de ser “moldes del capitalismo” centrados en la competencia, para adoptar la “Economía Rosquilla” de Kate Raworth, que busca el equilibrio entre la base social y el techo ecológico. Al incorporar el espíritu del “Mutirão” (esfuerzo colectivo) de los pueblos indígenas, la educación debe orientarse hacia la prosperidad del ecosistema global. Implementar este nuevo OS desde las aulas representa un “golpe de estado silencioso” para salvar nuestro futuro común.

【Suomenkielinen yhteenveto】

TÀmÀ artikkeli kÀsittelee koulutusta yhteiskunnan “kÀyttöjÀrjestelmÀnÀ (OS)” ja kysyy, onko nykyinen mallimme “vanhentunut OS (ego-jÀrjestelmÀ)”, joka edistÀÀ maapallon tuhoa. Vuoden 2025 COP30-kokouksen taustaa vasten kirjoittaja esittÀÀ, ettÀ koulutuksen on ensin lÀpikÀytÀvÀ “poisoppimisen (unlearn)” prosessi toimiakseen ratkaisuna ilmastonmuutokseen. Kouluja on lakattava pitÀmÀstÀ “kapitalismin harjoitusvÀlineinÀ”, jotka korostavat vain kilpailua ja tehokkuutta. Tilalle tarvitaan Kate Raworthin “donitsitaloustiedettÀ”, joka huomioi sekÀ sosiaaliset perustukset ettÀ ekologiset rajat. HyödyntÀmÀllÀ alkuperÀiskansojen “Mutirão”-henkeÀ (yhteisöllinen ponnistus), koulutus voi siirtyÀ tukemaan koko ekosysteemin kukoistusta. Uuden kÀyttöjÀrjestelmÀn asentaminen luokkahuoneissa on “hiljainen vallankaappaus”, joka voi muuttaa maailman suunnan.

ã€à€¹à€¿à€‚à€Šà¥€ à€žà€Ÿà€°à€Ÿà€‚à€¶ã€‘

à€¯à€¹ à€²à¥‡à€– à€¶à€¿à€•à¥à€·à€Ÿ à€•à¥‹ à€žà€®à€Ÿà€œ à€•à¥‡ “à€‘à€ªà€°à¥‡à€Ÿà€¿à€‚à€— à€žà€¿à€žà¥à€Ÿà€® (OS)” à€•à¥‡ à€°à¥‚à€ª à€®à¥‡à€‚ à€Šà¥‡à€–à€€à€Ÿ à€¹à¥ˆ à€”à€° à€žà€µà€Ÿà€² à€•à€°à€€à€Ÿ à€¹à¥ˆ à€•à€¿ à€•à¥à€¯à€Ÿ à€¹à€®à€Ÿà€°à¥€ à€µà€°à¥à€€à€®à€Ÿà€š à€¶à€¿à€•à¥à€·à€Ÿ à€ªà¥à€°à€£à€Ÿà€²à¥€ à€à€• “à€ªà¥à€°à€Ÿà€šà€Ÿ OS (à€ˆà€—à¥‹-à€žà€¿à€žà¥à€Ÿà€®)” à€¬à€š à€—à€ˆ à€¹à¥ˆ à€œà¥‹ à€ªà¥ƒà€¥à¥à€µà¥€ à€•à¥‡ à€µà€¿à€šà€Ÿà€¶ à€•à€Ÿ à€•à€Ÿà€°à€£ à€¬à€š à€°à€¹à¥€ à€¹à¥ˆà¥€ 2025 à€®à¥‡à€‚ à€¬à¥à€°à€Ÿà€œà¥€à€² à€®à¥‡à€‚ à€†à€¯à¥‹à€œà€¿à€€ COP30 à€•à¥‡ à€žà€‚à€Šà€°à¥à€­ à€®à¥‡à€‚, à€¯à€¹ à€€à€°à¥à€• à€Šà€¿à€¯à€Ÿ à€—à€¯à€Ÿ à€¹à¥ˆ à€•à€¿ à€¶à€¿à€•à¥à€·à€Ÿ à€•à¥‹ à€œà€²à€µà€Ÿà€¯à¥ à€ªà€°à€¿à€µà€°à¥à€€à€š à€•à¥‡ à€žà€®à€Ÿà€§à€Ÿà€š à€•à€Ÿ “à€¬à¥€à€œ” à€¬à€šà€šà¥‡ à€•à¥‡ à€²à€¿à€ à€žà€¬à€žà¥‡ à€ªà€¹à€²à¥‡ “à€…à€šà€²à€°à¥à€šà€¿à€‚à€—” (à€ªà¥à€°à€Ÿà€šà¥‡ à€µà€¿à€šà€Ÿà€°à¥‹à€‚ à€•à¥‹ à€›à¥‹à€¡à€Œà€šà€Ÿ) à€•à¥€ à€ªà¥à€°à€•à¥à€°à€¿à€¯à€Ÿ à€žà¥‡ à€—à¥à€œà€°à€šà€Ÿ à€¹à¥‹à€—à€Ÿà¥€ à€¹à€®à¥‡à€‚ à€žà¥à€•à¥‚à€²à¥‹à€‚ à€•à¥‹ à€•à¥‡à€µà€² à€ªà¥à€°à€€à€¿à€žà¥à€ªà€°à¥à€§à€Ÿ à€”à€° à€Šà€•à¥à€·à€€à€Ÿ à€ªà€° à€•à¥‡à€‚à€Šà¥à€°à€¿à€€ “à€ªà¥‚à€‚à€œà¥€à€µà€Ÿà€Š à€•à¥‡ à€ªà¥à€°à€¶à€¿à€•à¥à€·à€£ à€•à¥‡à€‚à€Šà¥à€°” à€•à¥‡ à€°à¥‚à€ª à€®à¥‡à€‚ à€Šà¥‡à€–à€šà€Ÿ à€¬à€‚à€Š à€•à€°à€šà€Ÿ à€¹à¥‹à€—à€Ÿà¥€ à€‡à€žà€•à¥‡ à€¬à€œà€Ÿà€¯, à€•à¥‡à€Ÿ à€°à€Ÿà€µà€°à¥à€¥ à€•à¥‡ “à€¡à¥‹à€šà€Ÿ à€‡à€•à¥‹à€šà¥‰à€®à€¿à€•à¥à€ž” à€•à¥‹ à€…à€ªà€šà€Ÿà€šà€Ÿ à€šà€Ÿà€¹à€¿à€ à€œà¥‹ à€žà€Ÿà€®à€Ÿà€œà€¿à€• à€†à€§à€Ÿà€° à€”à€° à€ªà€°à¥à€¯à€Ÿà€µà€°à€£à¥€à€¯ à€žà¥€à€®à€Ÿà€“à€‚ à€•à¥‡ à€¬à¥€à€š à€žà€‚à€€à¥à€²à€š à€¬à€šà€Ÿà€€à€Ÿ à€¹à¥ˆà¥€ à€žà¥à€µà€Šà¥‡à€¶à¥€ “à€®à¥à€€à€¿à€°à€Ÿà€“” (à€žà€Ÿà€®à¥‚à€¹à€¿à€• à€ªà¥à€°à€¯à€Ÿà€ž) à€•à¥€ à€­à€Ÿà€µà€šà€Ÿ à€•à¥‹ à€…à€ªà€šà€Ÿà€•à€°, à€¶à€¿à€•à¥à€·à€Ÿ à€•à¥‹ à€µà¥à€¯à€•à¥à€€à€¿à€—à€€ à€ªà¥à€°à€€à€¿à€žà¥à€ªà€°à¥à€§à€Ÿ à€•à¥‡ à€¬à€œà€Ÿà€¯ à€žà€Ÿà€®à¥‚à€¹à€¿à€• à€žà€®à¥ƒà€Šà¥à€§à€¿ (à€‡à€•à¥‹à€žà€¿à€žà¥à€Ÿà€®) à€•à¥€ à€“à€° à€¬à€¢à€Œà€šà€Ÿ à€šà€Ÿà€¹à€¿à€à¥€ à€•à€•à¥à€·à€Ÿ à€žà¥‡ à€‡à€ž à€šà€ OS à€•à¥‹ à€žà¥à€¥à€Ÿà€ªà€¿à€€ à€•à€°à€šà€Ÿ à€à€• “à€¶à€Ÿà€‚à€€ à€€à€–à¥à€€à€Ÿà€ªà€²à€Ÿ” à€¹à¥ˆ à€œà¥‹ à€­à€µà€¿à€·à¥à€¯ à€•à¥‹ à€¬à€šà€Ÿ à€žà€•à€€à€Ÿ à€¹à¥ˆà¥€